Explanation:
a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.
b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.
c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.
It’s D and goodluckkkkkkk
Answer:
predictive
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in the second scenario BSO employed predictive marketing research. This refers to marketing research that focuses on "What if" questions or scenarios in order to design a new plan. Which is what the second scenario is doing by asking "what if" they made an integrated advertising campaign targeted to younger markets.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
In the balance sheet, in order to account for the money or amounts that go to an fro in the sheet, we use the equation,
NW = As - Li
where NW is the networth, As is the asset, and Li is liabilities.
From the given above, the total asset (As) is given to be $166.859M. The net worth is equal to the sum of the common stock, cash, and retained earnings.
Networth = ($5.080 M) + ($8.040 M) + ($36.411 M)
Networth = $49.531
The the equation above, we may derive the equation for liability by transposing,
Li = Asset - Networth
Li = ($166.859 M) - ($49.531 M)
Li = $117.328
Hence, the total liability is equal to $117.328.
Answer:
d) the ratio of the money supply to the monetary base.
Explanation:
Money multiplier is the maximum change in checkable deposits (extra money) resulting from an increase in bank reserves by one dollar.
Money multiplier are enhanced by the central bank.
Additionally, the money multiplier is equal to the ratio of the money supply to the monetary base. This simply means that it is equal to one (1) divided by the required reserve ratio;
MM = 1 / (required reserve-deposit ratio).
