Complete question:
Compton Corporation, with operations throughout the country, will soon allocate corporate overhead to the firm's various responsibility centers. Which of the following is definitely not a cost object in this situation?
A) The maintenance department.
B) Product no. 675.
C) Compton Corporation.
D) The Midwest division.
E) The telemarketing center.
Answer:
Compton Corporation is definitely not a cost object in this situation
Explanation:
A cost object is a concept commonly used in financial reporting to describe the costs. Definitions commonly found in expense items include: product lines, geographical areas, clients, teams or anything else handling the costs.
Any object to which costs are independently calculated is a cost entity. In an organization, an expense item can be, for example a team, workmanship, production line or procedure.
For example, the costs of construction, customer support or revamping of a returned product may be tracked.
Answer:
a. Government should not intervene in the economy.
Explanation:
The concept of laissez-faire arose during the economic liberalism movement and promotes that the government should not intervene in the economy. According to laissez-faire, the main economic role of the government was to regulate and protect rights to private property.
Therefore, the answer is a. Government should not intervene in the economy.
Answer: Radically Innovative change.
Explanation: Beam Satellite Network is implementing a radically innovative change in their business strategy.
A radically innovative change involves applying new procedures, techniques and technology into a business to beat other existing businesses that are similar.
The answer to your question is Break-even analysis
Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4