If you show me the document I would be able to know but I can work it out for you if it was written by your teacher or you used the internet that means it’s a secondary source but if it was written at the exact date the assassination of Abraham Lincoln happened that means it is a primary source. Hope this helps
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the election of reps who make laws
Answer:
prime minister is Abi ahmed if i ak not wrong..
deputy prime minister is Demeke Mekonnen..
The mator of Addis Ababa is Takele uma Banti
<span>The answer is letter A: Autocracy. Absolute monarch is closely similar to autocracy. Autocracy is like dictatorship, wherein it is considered to be a system of the government wherein absolute power is given to one person only, an example of this is Adolf Hitler and Ferdinand Marcos ruling system</span>
