Answer:
Con: the constitution isn't specific and can in turn be used to validate improper things for example if the constitution doesn't specify and what a president show be like and states that anyone born in specific country and over the age of 36 can be president this means even criminals can be president which is a major con.
Pro: there is more diverse ideas to be heard because the constitution doesn't restrict people beliefs for example: A Muslim, Christian, atheist, agnostic, Buddhist person,etc can be president because the constitution doesn't restrict it and allows the free speech.
Explanation:
:)
Chewing ice can be normal, but the other two symptoms aren't, she has Adrenal fatigued. (Please make mine the brainlyess answer)
The independent regulatory agencies risks violating the constitutional concept of <u>separation of powers</u> if they make rules, enforce them and adjudicate disputes arising under those rules.
<h3>What is
separation of powers?</h3>
Separation of powers means the constitutional division of the legislative, executive and judicial functions of government among separate and independent bodies
In conclusion, the independent regulatory agencies risks violating the constitutional concept of <u>separation of powers</u> if they make rules, enforce them and adjudicate disputes arising under those rules.
Read more about separation of powers
<em>brainly.com/question/469945</em>
India is a secular democracy; the others are not.