The answer is TRUE. A community is a group of people with common characteristics or norms. Hope that helped. Have a nice day
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because they didn't have any fishing rods
The correct answer is True
Explanation:
Answer:
B: Roman women had some legal rights and were able to attend public events whereas Greek women were more secluded.
Explanation:
In Greece, there was a contrast between two prominent city-states, Athens and Sparta. Athens did not look upon women as Sparta did. While Athens women were considered lower than slaves, Spartan women were independent and could even own property. Apart from those two cities, Greek women in general did not have any political clout. Married women could have some opinion over their husbands’ political views but they did not have any rights such as vote or hold political office. In fact, it was considered improper for a woman to discuss politics in a public setting. In most city-states, women were accompanied wherever they had to go; their main role was to give birth to children, particularly to male.
Roman women could shop, speak with friends, and visit temples without asking their husband for permission. During the years that Rome was an Empire, women gained more freedom and it was legal for women to own land, run businesses, free slaves, make wills, inherit wealth, and get paid jobs. In ancient Rome, only free adult men were citizens. Although women were not citizens of ancient Rome, they enjoyed a great deal more freedom than did women in ancient Greece.
In Rome
In general, Roman women enjoyed more freedom than women in Classical Athens.
He discussed for democracy, but not for freedom, appealing
that anyone who differs with the general will should be involuntary to monitor
it. He appears to be supporting something like an "absolute
democracy" with complete civil equality, a factual democracy before a
republic, and he openly says that political parties would weaken or disintegrate
a political system founded on the general will.
A dictatorship crashes with this wholly for the reason that whoever governs
the country is not governmentally equal with the rest of the individuals and
can create an oppression of an individual or party. He is disagreeing for a tyranny of the
majority.