3 years ago

3(2x+10)=6x-30 solve

Mathematics

2 answers:

ira [324]3 years ago

8 0

3(2x+10) = 6x-30

Expand by using distributive property

6x + 30 = 6x - 30

30 ≠ - 30

No solution

Answer

No solution

melisa1 [442]3 years ago

7 0

3(2x + 10) = 6x - 30

3(2x) + 3(10) = 6x - 30

6x + 30 = 6x - 30

30 = -30

THERE IS NO SOLUTION

You might be interested in

Use the Pythagorean theorem to solve for x

Andre45 [30]

Answer: 15

Step-by-step explanation:

12^2 + 9^2 = 225

square root of 225 = 15

5 0

3 years ago

1 hundredth is how many times greater than 1 thousand?

Paladinen [302]

10 times larger than a thousand. Also one decimal place larger

7 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

puteri [66]

Answer:

22.5

Step-by-step explanation:

You just have to do 60 divided by 2.66 (The decimal form of 2/3) and then you have your answer PLEASE BRAINLIEST

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

[(-21)+(-20)+(-19)………+(+18)+(+19)+(20)]:<br> (-3)=? İşlemin sonucunu bulunuz.<br> A) -7 B) -2 C) 2 D

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

A) -7

Step-by-step explanation:

good luck......

5 0

3 years ago

Using mathematical induction prove whether or not the following statement is true for all positive integers n, or show why it is

aniked [119]

Base case: For $n=1$ , the left side is 2 and the right is $2\cdot1^2=2$ , so the base case holds.

Induction hypothesis: Assume the statement is true for $n=k$ , that is

$2+6+10+\cdots+4k-2=2k^2$

We want to show that this implies truth for $n=k+1$ , that

$2+6+10+\cdots+4k-2+4(k+1)-2=2(k+1)^2$

The first $k$ terms on the left reduce according to the assumption above, and we can simplify the $k+1$ -th term a bit:

$\underbrace{2+6+10+\cdots+4k-2}_{2k^2}+4k+2$

$2k^2+4k+2=2(k^2+2k+1)=2(k+1)^2$

so the statement is true for all $n\in\mathbb N$ .

5 0

3 years ago