The redrawing of territorial boundaries in Africa did not take into account the ethnic and linguistic groups there. If you look at the map of Africa, there are strikingly many straight lines - unlike in places where the bourders formed over centuries of re-negotiation (such as in Europe). The redrawn boundaries often split nations in half and grouped hostile nations together, often in similar proportions, which meant that no nation had the majority. Another case was that the minority of one country was a majority in other.
This has created a potential for civil and other wars, which unfortunately did happen and continue to happen.
Answer:
in group bias
Explanation:
In-group bias: In social psychology, the term in-group bias is also referred to as in-group favoritism, in-group preference, in-group–out-group bias, and intergroup bias.
In-group bias is defined as a phenomenon in which an individual displays a particular pattern of supporting different members of his or her in-group as compared to the out-group people or members. It can be displayed in terms of the evaluation of one person who belongs to a specific group by a member of the other group.
In the question above, the girls' beliefs best illustrates in group-bias.
It's between b and c because they are good examples but c is more recommended
Answer:
C. North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
Explanation:
North Atlantic Treaty Organization was formed by the Washington Treaty, also known as the North Atlantic Treaty, that was signed on April 5th, 1949. It is a strategic political and military alliance founded by the nations from North America and Europe ( in which United States played an important part) promising collective defense that aim to establish a credible alternative to the forces of the Soviet Union deployed in Central and Eastern Europe after the Second World War.
Answer:
The models reduce complex situations into the simplest forms. The graphs equations and figures show how everything works.