Answer:
- Preposterous.
Explanation:
As per the question, the boldfaced word that best accomplishes the given sentence would be 'preposterous' as the another option goes completely out of context. The word 'preposterous' implies 'something absurd or ludicrous which is contrary to common sense' that appropriately fits to the context of the sentence and completes as well as accomplishes its meaning. After using this word, the sentence would imply that however, in earlier times the consideration of Earth as flat was an accepted fact but for today's scientist it is simply '<u>preposterous</u>' or 'senseless or shocking'.
The book "The Cultural History of Cherokee Indians" would be the least likely to serve as a primary source, as option A shows.
<h3>What is a primary source?</h3>
- A document created by witnesses to an event.
- A document created at the time the event is happening.
- A first-hand account.
A book that tells the history of a people cannot be considered a primary source. That's because this book was created by researching other sources and tells events that were not witnessed by the author, being, therefore, a secondary source.
Learn more about primary sources at the link:
brainly.com/question/24511160
#SPJ1
Usually the protagonist and/or the antagonist.
"Although it was raining fairly hard the Team still played its best game ever. "
I think that could be the answer- but I'm not 100% sure :') hope this helped.
Hello, This question is incomplete. The full question is:
When we arrived, however, the library was closed. About a dozen people were milling about the glass front doors, wearing puzzled expressions and muttering with frustration
Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding for the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?
A. The quality is good; the evidence supports the claim by using a personal example to show that there is clear community demand for the library's services
B. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the claim by showing a need, but it would be better if the writer had asked each person why they were frustrated.
C. The quality is poor; the evidence does not give an exact statistic to explain how many of the people were at the library to attend a program.
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Answer:
D. The quality is okay; the evidence supports the idea that the library offers programs, but it would be better if the writer had asked these people what specific programs they attended.
Explanation:
In order to present a good support of evidence, the author must present data about the programs offered by the library, their quality, availability and the relevance they present. In order to know about these data, it would be important that the author had heard the public's opinion about the library's programs, since, as users, the public can offer a view with less bias.
