Answer:
the answer is because it would never be equal
Explanation:
The decision to build the park or not would be based solely
on the cost – benefit relationship of this project. Since there is no other
factor considered in this problem, you only need to see if the benefit of
constructing the park would exceed its cost. In this problem, the cost to
construct the park is $20,000 while the marginal benefit would be $24,000
($8,000 x 3 families that can benefit from this project). Therefore, you can
say that the benefit has exceeded its cost. As a conclusion, the neighborhood
park should be built because it benefits the families living in that area more
than its cost.
If a customer purchases Charmin bath tissue at a price that is higher but of the same quality as a generic brand, Charmin has established brand equity with the customer.
What does "brand equity" entail?
A marketing term for a brand's value is "brand equity."Consumer experiences and perceptions of the brand determine that value.Positive brand equity indicates that people value a brand.
What is a brand when multiple products are sold under the same name?
Umbrella branding, also known as family branding, is a marketing strategy in which a single brand name is used to sell two or more products that are related to one another.Companies with positive brand equity (the value of a brand in a particular market) typically employ umbrella branding.
Learn more about brand equity here:
brainly.com/question/29733482
#SPJ4
(Paragraph 1) Should eyewitness testimony be allowed in the courtroom? No but at the same time yes. There are many reasons why they should but shouldn't. It is a risk to their safety, some eyewitnesses are not liable, they could be paid off but at the same time their testimony could help win a case. (Paragraph 2) Depending on a crime, the eyewitness safety could be in danger. If the case was against a member of a gang or mafia. They could send someone after that witness. This is reason why we have the Witness Protection Program. If they testify they put their lives at risk. (Paragraph 3) Having a witness is a key thing to have. If you have a witness you are the one who most likely the one to win the case. In some cases you could have problems with the witness not being liable, getting paid off to not say anything or to lie. Or in most cases if they are confused they will not have them testify. Or they aren't straight on the details and keep changing the story that usually means they are lying on what they saw.
Note: This is a summary. Add more and edit it to make it sound like something you would type.
Answer:
b. No journal entry is required
Explanation:
Given that
Estimated percentage of losing = 40%
Estimated amount = $800,000
By considering the above information, we concluded that
As in the case of the litigation, there is no journal entry is recorded as the possibility of the event is not certain with respect to the entity's economic resources.
Therefore in the given case, the correct option is b.
