Answer:
in steps
Step-by-step explanation:
The question did not state if alpha>beta or alpha<beta, so the answer will have 2 answers for each questions
3x²-9x+2=0
x = (-(-9) ± √(-9)²-4*(3)*(2)) / (2*3)
x = (9 + √57) / 6 or x = (9 - √57) / 6 (alpha and beta) or (beta and alpha)
(I) alpha (a) ×beta (b) + alpha² × beta = ab (1+a)
= ((9 + √57) / 6) ((9 - √57) / 6) (1 + (9 ± √57))
= ((9² - (√57)²)/36) (10 ± √57)
= (24/36) (10 ± √57)
= 2/3 (10 ± √57) or (11.7 or 1.63)
(ii) alpha²-alpha×beta+beta² = a² -2ab + b² +ab = (a - b)² + ab
if a is alpha
= ((9 + √57) / 6) - ((9 - √57) / 6)) + ((9 + √57) / 6) ((9 - √57) / 6))
= √57/3 + 2/3
= (√57 + 2) / 3
if a is beta
((9 - √57) / 6) - ((9 + √57) / 6)) + ((9 - √57) / 6) ((9 + √57) / 6))
= - √57/3 + 2/3
= - (√57 + 2) / 3
<h2>
There are infinite solution of y.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
y = 
- 10x + 25
To find, the total number of solutions = ?
∴ y = - 10x + 25
⇒ y = - 2(x)(5) + 
⇒ y = 
There are infinite solution of y.
Thus, there are infinite solution of y.
11, 13, and 16. sorry if im wrong, and i hope this helps.
5% of $62.62= 3.13$
18% of $62.62= 11.28$
so add 11.28 to 62.62- 3.13 and they would pay a total of $48.29
- The best method to test Zoe's claim is an observational study, as with this method it is possible to observe if the claim presents some truth to it. Observational studies are often used in testing claims like Zoe's as they allowed to have a great access to the variable that are behind a claim of that type, and so they are also more accessible.
- The set up I would use is an observational study of a great number of people, over a long period of time, that have to have<span> kale for breakfast every day, with a measurement of their cholesterol over the time. the great number and the long period of study assured that the variable subject of study is statistically represented in an optimal way. </span>
