Answer:
androgynous characteristics.
Explanation:
An androgynous characteristics of a person are defined as the person having a high tendency of having both masculine and feminine traits i.e instrumental and expressive traits.
Example: A masculine individual will rank high on masculine (instrumental) traits and low on feminine (expressive) traits.
Psychological androgyny describes the women and men who exhibit both feminine and masculine attributes.
According to researcher Sandra Bem, these parents are encouraging their children towards androgynous characteristics.
Answer:
Option 3
Explanation:
Convergent thinking involves searching a best fit to a solution among a given set if problems. Suppose we have a group of answers relating to a question, the use of convergent thinking involves searching for the beat answer to the question. This method is mostly applicable to exam questions that seems to be difficult to students.
Based on the explanation given above, option C best explains the answer as narrowing down the available solutions that suits a particular problem.
It is imperative to educate children and teenagers so that they can assist in dealing with their current trauma and preventing future conflicts.
Students living in conflict zones often have to deal with traumatizing experiences, dislocated families, loss, as well as the associated emotions of anger and fear that accompany these experiences. Trauma not only affects students psychologically and neurobiologically, but associated emotions may also cause conflict as they enter adult society. It is necessary for a country and its citizens to heal in order to move forward. Providing psychosocial support, social networks, and life skills to recovering from trauma is key to preventing its repercussions in the future.
<em>Hope this helps :)</em>
Answer:
The Secret classification level "shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security."
I think the president selects a judge whom he considers the most qualified and will most likely support his agenda.
