Answer: $324,800
Explanation:
It is a general Principle that when calculating income tax expense, that the Extraordinary loss is treated separately because it is not a usual thing.
The income gained from changing the Accounting principle is not included as well.
The Taxable income to be recorded therefore is,
Taxable income = Income + Gain on disposal - Unusual loss (due to its infrequency)
Taxable income = 928,000 + 32,000 - 148,000
Taxable income = $812,000
Tax expense would therefore be,
= 812,000 * 40%
= $324,800
$324,800 is the amount of income tax expense Arreaga would report on its income statement.
Answer:
D1 = $3.50
D2 = $3.50
D3 = $3.50
Ke = 10% = 0.1
Po = <u>D1</u> + <u>D2</u> + <u>D3
</u>
(1+ke) (1+ke)2 (1+ke)3
Po = <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50</u> + <u>$3.50
</u>
(1+0.1) (1+0.1)2 (1+0.1)3
Po = $3.18 + $2.89 + $2.63
Po = $8.70
None of the above
Explanation:
In this scenario, we need to discount the dividend in each year by the required at rate of return of 10%. The aggregate of the price obtained as a result of discounting in year 1 to year 3 gives the current market price.
Answer:
the expected return on the portfolio is 15.50%
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return on the portfolio is shown below:
Total investment is
= $2,700 + $3,800
= $6,500
Now
Expected return of portfolio is
= ($2,700 ÷ $6,500) × 12 + ($3,800 ÷ $6,500) × 18
= 4.98% + 10.52%
= 15.50%
Hence, the expected return on the portfolio is 15.50%
Answer:
D. Zeta prevails, but only if the assignment is signed and in writing
Explanation:
Zeta prevails but only if the assignment is in writing and is signed.
If the assignment is express thereby and is signed by the parties in contract , then zeta can demand the amount from willy. Without any written consent and permission , willy cannot enforce the payment to zeta.
This is the best option in this case .
