Question:
The Dodd-Frank wall street reform and protection act stipulated that if more than $1 million is collected, the whistle-blower is entitled to _____ of the monies collected.
A) between 10 and 30 percent
B) a minimum of 50 percent
C) a minimum of 75 percent
D) between 50 and 75 percent
Answer:
The correct answer is A) Between 10 and 30 percent of the monies collected.
Explanation:
The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (also known as Dodd–Frank) is a US Federal Law that was instituted on July 21, 2010.
It was created to revamp the financial regulation in the aftermath of the Great Recession, and brought about reforms to all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation's financial services industry.
Under the act, whistle blowers were promised 10-30 percent of all monies collected.
Cheers!
<u>Answer: </u>leads to the development of a sourcing plan
<u>Explanation:</u>
Inventory planning includes the safety stock planning. Safety stock planning means the additional maintenance of the stock to avoid the situation of being completely out of stock when needed. Safety stock acts as the buffer stock during the times of unexpected sudden increase in demand.
Through inventory and safety planning the goods can be accumulated based on the sale or the production of the firm. These things lead to the development of the source planning.
Answer:
12.75 %
Explanation:
Cost of Capital is calculated on a Weighted Average basis. This is because there is a Pooling of Funds when it comes to financing projects. So Cost of Capital is the Return that is Required by providers of Long Term source of finance.
Cost of Capital = E/V × Ke + D/V × Kd
Where,
E/V = Market Weight of Equity
= 0.55
Ke = Cost of Equity
= 15%
D/E = Market Weight of Debt
= 0.45
Kd = Cost of Debt
= 10%
Therefore,
Cost of Capital = 0.55 × 15% + 0.45 × 10%
= 12.75 %
Answer:
a. Counterclaim
Explanation:
Counterclaim is a claim by a defendant (the person be sued) against the plaintiff (the person who sues first).
Lyn is the plaintiff, who first sued Karl (the defendant). Karl's claim against the original plaintiff (Lyn) is an example of a counterclaim.
Another example is counterclaim by the city of Sandy Springs against Holder Construction Group, the company that built the city of Sandy Springs’ new City Springs complex.
Holder Construction Group earlier sued Sandy Springs city over disagreements on payments for the work.
The city filed a counterclaim to a superior Court, claiming that Holder Group should be denied payments until all work is done and for breach of contract, negligent construction and fraud.
