Answer:
The correct answer is D. Those in police custody had certain rights
Explanation:
In Miranda vs Arizona, the supreme court specifically stated that if a person in custody is interrogated by the police, and does not consult with his or her lawyer about what to say druing the interrogation, then, nothing of what he or she says can be used by the prosecutor during trial.
For example, if John Smith is taken into custody, and does not have the legal knowledge to ask for lawyer to provide him with legal advice before interrogation, nothing of what he says to the police can be used by prosecutor Robert Robertson in order to incriminate him during trial.
1.5 would be the answer!
I hope this helps you!
Answer:
agree
Explanation:
this is what humans are meant to do.
Answer:
Great attitude. That I will try to do the time and that is it.
Explanation:
I love exercising because it keeps me healthy and looking good. If I just follow the schedule then I will not do more than that.
Hope this helps.
