Answer:
"$1,673,750" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
The given values in the question are:
Applied overhead,
= $666,250
Actual overhead,
= $650,000
Unadjusted cost,
= $1,690,000
Now,
The overapplied overhead will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
hence,
The goods sold's adjusted cost will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
Answer:
There are some other ways to act scenario analysis. The standard method is to decide the standard deviation of regular or monthly safety returns and so calculate what amount is required for this portfolio if each security yields returns that exist two or three standard deviations above and below the average performance. This means the analyst may get a fair amount of certainty considering the difference in the value of the portfolio within a given period, by simulating these extremes. Scenarios being thought may refer to one single variable, e.g., the relative success or failure of the current product launching, or the combination of elements, e.g., those results of the product launch combined with possible changes in the activities of competitor businesses. The purpose is to examine the effects of the more extreme results to define an investment strategy.
Answer:
4. compounding daily
Explanation:
The higher the compounding rate , the higher the compound interest. Compounding daily would therefore yield the highest amount of money.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Wayman Corporation
Multiple-step income statement
Sales $425,000
Less: Cost of goods sold <u>$135,000</u>
Gross Profit $290,000
Operating Expenses
Salary Expenses $45,000
Utility Expenses $55,000
Advertising Expenses <u>$35,000</u>
Total Operating Expenses <u>($135,000)</u>
Net Operating Income $155,000
Other Income and Expenses
Interest expense <u>$25,000</u>
Net Income before Tax $130,000
Income tax expense <u>$55,000
</u>
Net Income <u>$75,000</u>
