1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jobisdone [24]
2 years ago
15

QUESTION 9

Law
2 answers:
Brut [27]2 years ago
8 0
The Answer to question 9 is true
mafiozo [28]2 years ago
8 0
The correct answer to this question is true
You might be interested in
What is the final step of any historical research project?
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

I know someone that has the answer

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pat and Terry have lived as a couple for two years in New Hampshire. Pat has beaten Terry more than once. Terry has been in the
lianna [129]

Answer:

Yes, law enforcement can use the recording in court because it is a direct personal threat.

Explanation:

Pat is threatening Terry with violence and possible murder, which is impiled when Pat said "No one will ever find your body". This can be used in court to support Terry's case that Pat has or could become violent and hurt Terry at some point.

3 0
2 years ago
Even with sentencing guidelines, judges have choices about the sentence to assign. They can show leniency and impose the smalles
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

The defendant's background

Explanation:

I would want to know what they are all about and what they have done in the past. This would help me make my decision of the best possible sentence.

8 0
2 years ago
The signals on a railroad crossing are defective. Although the railroad company was notified of the problem a month earlier, the
Dennis_Churaev [7]

I think it's both the railroad inspector and the driver who drives the car. The railroad inspector didn't come fix the problem and the driver didn't take his car to the shop to get his problem fixed. So honestly, it's both their faults.

5 0
3 years ago
In the case of Colorado v. Connelly (1986), Supreme Court Justice Brennan considered ______________ to be the strongest piece of
KIM [24]

Answer:

A Confession

Explanation:

In the case of Colorado v. Connelly (1986), Supreme Court Justice Wiliam Brennan considered A CONFESSION to be the strongest piece of evidence in a trial.

This is evident when he wrote in his dissent among other things that "Triers of fact accord confessions such heavyweight in their determination that the introduction of a confession makes the other aspects of a trial in court superfluous and the real trial, for all practical purposes, occurs when the confession is obtained."

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What evidence led authorities to believe Jimmy committed the crime?
    5·1 answer
  • Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jac
    11·1 answer
  • Theresa is the manager of Ascot Bank, a locally bank in her hometown. In addition to managing relationships with her employees a
    14·2 answers
  • 3. Think about how our government functions today. If George Washington were still alive,
    11·1 answer
  • On Election Day, which Poll Worker position is responsible for the setup and breakdown of the EViD?
    12·2 answers
  • A man walks into a bar orders a drink and asks the bartender why he chose that profession. The bartender tells him that you don'
    15·1 answer
  • Is restorative justice more effective than adversarial justice?
    10·1 answer
  • Vivian (28) is the beneficiary of her deceased grandmother's traditional IRA. She received a Form 1099-R reporting the $10,000 g
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    5·1 answer
  • "In order to lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a cert
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!