The kind of power that the project manager should try to use in this type of situation is an: expert power.
A project manager refers to an individual who is saddled with the responsibility of planning, controlling, maintaining, and managing a group of people (team members) that are working under him or her, especially for the execution of a project.
In Project management, a project manager has different kinds of power and these include:
- Formal (legitimate) Power
Expert power is one of the most effective kinds of power and it is typically possessed by a project manager that is a professional (expert) in a particular subject, field or project.
Since the project manager is working in a weak-matrix organizational environment and has no power or budget to reward her team members, she should use her expert power to oversee the complex custom CSM solution project.
In conclusion, the kind of power that the project manager should try to use in this type of situation is an expert power.
Read more on expert power here: brainly.com/question/25622349
"Bob and Phil" employees will have access to the New World account.
<u>Option:</u> A
<u>Explanation:</u>
The East sale's executive and manager is Karen, where Richard and Kevin are representatives, the West sale's executive and manager is Wendy, where Sam and Wilder are representatives. Although both Karen and Wendy are under CEO Bob. Richard owns NewCompany account while Kevin owns an OldCompany account. Karen shared her account manually with Kevin named as NewWorld. But Karen moved on to head Named Accounts, while Phil replaced Karen in NewWorld. Thus finally Bob being CEO (who use to manage both Karen and Wendy) and Phil (who replaced Karen) will only have access to the NewWorld account.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Would you consider this an ethical marketing strategy?
No. Of course not. It is not ethical. However, it is not illegal.
It cannot be considered ethical because this piece of advertisement is playing with the lack and necessity of the poor people of San Dayana.
The lottery advertisement is trying to be lucrative and benefit from the ignorance and poverty of the people of this poor country.
Once said that people are the ones who had the last word on the decision to buy or not to buy the lottery tickets. They know that the probabilities are minimum to win the big prize.
So instead of work, save and invest, or do other legal things to prosper, they prefer to spend their hard-earn money to get the "miracle" and become rich.
Answer:
8.37%
Explanation:
WACC = [E / (D + E)](Re) + [D / (D + E)](Rd)(1 - T)
E = market value of equity
D = market value of debt
Re = cost of equity
Rd = cost of debt
T = taxes
- E = 3,000,000 common stocks x $50 = $150,000,000
- DP = 1,000,000 preferred stock x $33 = $33,000,000
- DB = 80,000 bonds x $1,080 = $86,400,000
- Re = (dividend / stock price) + growth rate = ($2.4 / $50) + 6% = 0.048 + 6% = 0.108 or 10.8%
- Rdp = $2.70 / $33 = 8.18%
- Rdb = $85 / $1,080 = 7.87%
- T = 33%
WACC = [E / (D + E)](Re) + [DP / (D + E)](Rdp)(1 - T) + [DB / (D + E)](Rdb)(1 - T)
since the numbers are too large, I will divide the calculation into three parts:
- [E / (D + E)](Re) = [$150,000,000 / ($119,400,000 + $150,000,000)](10.8%) = ($150,000,000 / $269,400,000) x 10.8% = 0.5568 x 10.8% = 0.0601 or 6.01%
- [DP / (D + E)](Rdp)(1 - T) = ($33,000,000 / $269,400,000) x 8.18% x (1 - 33%) = 0.1225 x 8.18% x 67% = 0.0067 or 0.67%
- [DB / (D + E)](Rdb)(1 - T) = ($86,400,000 / $269,400,000) x 7.87% x 67% = 0.0169 or 1.69%
WACC = 6.01% + 0.67% + 1.69% = 8.37%
Answer:
When Monopolies Are Good. Sometimes a monopoly is necessary. It ensures consistent delivery of a product or service that has a very high up-front cost. An example is electric and water utilities. Brainliest Please
Explanation: