a) Abolitionists were everything from abusive to humanitarians, according to Potter. Holt, on the other hand, was a professor so he provided a more lucid interpretation of the Civil War, as a matter of fact, Holt sees the conflict as a breakdown in America's democratic political process.
b) Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
During the Republic (509-27BCE), the citizens of Rome held a large amount of power. All citizens, were allowed to vote for laws and public officials, and were under the protection of Romes walls and vast armies. If you joined the army, you would often be payed in land, usually some of the land you just helped <span>conquer. The Romans had great deal of power over their citizens they ruled.
</span>
11. appellate jurisdiction
12. county court
13. florida supreme court
14. US district court
Answer:
Predynastic
Early Dynastic
Old Kingdom
First Intermediate Period
Middle Kingdom
Second Intermediate period
NEW KINGDOM
Explanation:
let me know if this helped
D. Whether or not fugitive slaves who escaped to free states were legally free.
