Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

5

Which of following most accurately describes when investigators pursuing U.S. Public Health Service funding are required to disc

lose their significant financial interests to their institution?

1 answer:

maksim [4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Investigators are required to disclose their significant financial interests no later than the time of applying for PHS funding.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Why are some producers forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price? Group of answer choices price takers find m

Crank

Some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitor's products.

<h3>What is the prevailing market price?</h3>

Prevailing Market Price refers to the market's published wholesale price and, in the absence of a declared wholesale price, the prevailing market price of any commodities.
The term "prevailing market conditions" refers to the average amount of rent paid by operators of similar sized and placed lodges throughout the country, as determined in good faith by the national protected area authority.
Because of their great degree of similarity to competitors' products, some producers are forced to offer their items at the prevailing market price.
The average wage paid to similarly employed workers in a certain occupation in the area of anticipated employment is described as the prevailing wage rate.

Therefore, some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitors' products.

Know more about market prices here:

brainly.com/question/24877850

#SPJ4

The complete question is given below:
Why are some producers forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price?

A. price takers find market analysis is too costly

B. they are very small players in the overall market

C. high degree of similarity to competitor's products

D. they can increase output without affecting the quality

8 0

1 year ago

Your brother, who is prone to bearing substantial risk, suggests that you buy a security for $10,000 that promises to pay you $1

astraxan [27]

Answer:

16.59%

Explanation:

First we look at the formula which to determine the future value of the security and then work back to determine the annual return in terms of percentage

Future Value = Present Value x (1 +i)∧n

where i = the annual rate of return

n= number of years or period

We then plug the given figures into the equation as follows

we already know Present value to be $10,000 and the future value to be $100,000 and the number of years to be 15

Therefore, the implied annual return or yield on the investment is

100,000 = 10,000 x (1+i)∧15

(1+i)∧15 = 100,000/10,000 = 10

1 + i = (10∧(1/15))=1.165914

i= 1.165914-1

= 0.1659

= 16.59%

5 0

3 years ago

S4-2 (similar to) Question Help Sally's FurnitureSally's Furniture uses departmental overhead rates (rather than a plantwide ov

mr_godi [17]

Complete Question:

S4-2 (similar to) Question Help. Sally's Furniture uses departmental overhead rates (rather than a plantwide overhead rate) to allocate its manufacturing overhead to jobs. The company's two production departments have the following departmental overhead rates: Cutting Department: $8 per machine hour Finishing Department: $14 per direct labor hour Job 112112 used the following direct labor hours and machine hours in the two manufacturing departments:

Resources used for Job 112112

Cutting Finishing

Direct Labor Hours 6 10

Machine Hours 6 7

Requirements:

1. How much manufacturing overhead should be allocated to Job 112112?

2. Assume that direct labor is paid at a rate of $23 per hour and Job 112112 used $2,400 of direct materials. What was the total manufacturing cost of Job 112112? 1. How much manufacturing overhead should be allocated to Job 112112? Calculate the total manufacturing overhead for the job by using a formula for each department's overhead amount and then adding both amounts together. First determine the formula and overhead for the Cutting Department.

Answer:

Sally's Furniture

1. Manufacturing overhead allocated to Job 112112:

Cutting department = Machine hour rate x machine hours

= $8 x 6 = $48

Finishing department = Direct labor hour rate x direct labor hours

= $14 x 10 = $140

Total manufacturing overhead = $188 ($48 + 140)

2. Total manufacturing cost of Job 112112:

Direct materials = $2,400

Direct labor = 368 (16 x $23)

Overhead = 188

Total cost = $2,956

Explanation:

a) Data:

Departmental overhead rates:

Cutting Department: $8 per machine hour

Finishing Department: $14 per direct labor hour

b) Job Costing is a costing method that allocates the costs of resources for manufacturing goods and services according to the costs consumed by each job. Each job becomes a cost center for accumulating costs instead of the process involved in the production. The system helps management to keep track of the costs of each job.

5 0

3 years ago

Link Company uses a process cost system and the weighted average method. During the year the company completed 1,300 units of pr

Bumek [7]

Answer:

Cost per equivalent unit: $60

Explanation:

Cost per equivalent unit = (Cost of Beginning Work in Progress Inventory + Total production cost during the period) / Equivalent Units of Production (EUP)

Total Production Cost = $90,000

Equivalent Units of production (EUP) = 1,300 + 400 x 50% = 1,500 units

Cost per equivalent unit: $90,000 / 1,500 units = $60

7 0

3 years ago

A company is deciding if it should design an advertising system for use on Twitter©. The first option is to skip out on designin

Vladimir79 [104]

Answer:

SYSTEM A

Explanation:

Given the following :

First option :

Skip design = No net gain or loss

System A:

Additional sales of $50,000 under good condition

Additional sales of $10,000 under bad condition

System B:

Increase sale by $20,000 under both good and bad condition

Cost of system development = $25,000

Good condition are twice as likely to occur as bad condition

Hence, we have : good, good, bad

Probability of good = 2/3 = 0.667

Probability of bad = 1/3 = 0.333

We can calculate the Expected monetary Value of the three options :

First option:

Skip design : Expected monetary Value = $0

Second option (SYSTEM A) :

Profit from good condition :

Additional sales - system cost = ($50,000 - $25,000) =$25, 000

Loss from bad condition :

($25,000 - $10,000) = - $15,000

Expected monetary value:

(0.667 * 25000) + (0.33 * - 15000)

$16675 - $4950

= $11,680

Third option (SYSTEM B) :

Additional sales - system cost

$20,000 - $25,000 = - $5,000

From the expected monetary value obtained for the three options, System A is the best option with $11,680

4 0

3 years ago