Risk transferring refers to taking risk or risk that may occur from one party and moving it to another. If there was a chance risk may occur, conducing a 'what if' analysis will allow the organization to see what may happen if they do or do not transfer risk to another party.
This action could have been caused by writing off an uncollectible account.
A write-off can be described as the removal of an accounts receivable that cannot be collected which was put in the general ledger.
If an account is uncollectible, then it means that the amount that would not be collected would be eliminated. It also means that a previous allowance balance is going to get reduced.
Read more on brainly.com/question/23306803?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The 52 of its portfolio should be allocated to the zero-coupon bonds to immunie if there are no other assets funding the plan.
Explanation:
the duration of the perpetuity = (1+YTM)/YTM
= (1+0.04)/0.04
= 26 years
the weights of the bonds = w
5*w + 26*(1-w) = 15
5*w + 26 - 26*w = 15
21*w = 11
w = 0.52
Therefore, The 52 of its portfolio should be allocated to the zero-coupon bonds to immunie if there are no other assets funding the plan.
Answer:
Part - (a)
Since A constructively holds stock through her son and a prohibited interest within the 10 years of divestment, she will not receive a favorable treatment.
Part - (b)
The sale may qualify for redemption if A decides to become a creditor within a 10 years period. Creditors do not hold prohibited interest in corporations, typically because they hold no voting rights.
Part - (c)
The act of replacing, or office held by a family member, does not constitute a prohibited interest. Therefore: the sale should qualify.
Part - (d)
Accepting the stocks as gift would trigger a prohibited interest. The size of the gift and her son's shares and will nullify the 10 year rule.