Answer: C. Purchase facultative reinsurance and write the policy
Explanation:
The options are:.
A. Purchase another treaty and write the policy
B. Decline the business for reinsurance reasons
C. Purchase facultative reinsurance and write the policy
D. Cede the policy to the existing treaty if the risk is acceptable
Based on the information given, we should note that in a case whereby an application is submitted for a home which falls within the directive and Aurora does not wish to retain the entire risk, the best method of handling this submission will be to buy a facultative reinsurance and then write the policy.
A facultative reinsurance is the coverage that is bought by a primary insurer in order to cover a particular risk. Hence, it'll be used to cover the single risk in this case.
Answer:
$1,160
Explanation:
<em>Hie, I have attached the full question as an image below.</em>
The firm usually makes provision for certain amounts so as not to overstate their profits. This expected as it is prudent than reporting profits that might never occur. Provisions of Uncollectible accounts are examples of such amounts.
An increase in Uncollectible amount compared to the opening balance is treated as an Expense in the Income Statement whilst a decrease is treated as an Income.
For this question, we are told that Uncollectible accounts are determined by the percent-of-sales method to be 4% of credit sales. Thus calculation of the 2012 uncollectible-account expense is as follows :
Credit Sales - 2012 = $44,000
Beginning Balance in allowances = $600
Therefore,
Uncollectable Amount (2012) = Credit Sales x percent-of-sales
= $44,000 x 4%
= $1,760
The Uncollectable amount has increased by $1,160 ($1,760 - $600)
Conclusion :
The collectible-account expense for 2012 is $1,160
Answer:
1,386.67%
Explanation:
Loan Amount = $8.25
Repayment Amount = $10.45
Hence,
Interest for a week = Repayment Amount - Loan Amount
= $10.45 - $8.25
= $2.2
Interest percentage for a week:
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65e3/b65e3a1ba249e3537f41d2ba2f4e910785c4d4cc" alt="\frac{Interest\ for\ a\ week}{Loan\ Amount}\times100"
= data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73021/73021f804270fa5160d07fe147a85afb7709fd99" alt="\frac{2.2}{8.25}\times100"
= 26.66% (approx)
Number of weeks in a year = 52
Therefore,
Effective annual return:
= Interest percentage for a week × Number of weeks in a year
= 26.66% × 52
= 1,386.67%
Hence, effective annual return Friendly’s earns on this lending business is 1,386.67%
.
APR you are paying 1,386.67%.
Answer:
Irrational decision
Explanation:
Irrational decisions refer to those decisions which are not taken after enough deliberation, ignore the rationale, facts and logic, are rather decided out of whim and impulse and usually instantly decided.
In the given case, Joe was not willing to pay more than $500 cash yet eventually ended up paying $600. Even if the $25 gift card is considered, he ended up paying $575 which is more than he had decided to pay.
The choice of the consumer here is not rational or rather irrational since, he without considering other alternatives or exercise of judgement, without evaluating his costs, impulsively opted for the credit card lured by $25 gift card.
As per the economic theory, Joe's decision would be referred to as irrational.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "<span>c. Your friend's parents take out a loan to buy her ea condo to live in while she is at college. Meanwhile, the housing market plummets. By the time your friends leaves college, the condo os worth significantly less than the value of the loan."</span>