The analogy that best describes united states society today is
"<span>
the salad bowl".</span>
The salad bowl<span> idea
proposes that the mix of the various societies of United States occupants
consolidate like a plate of mixed salad, rather than the more conventional
thought of a cultural melting pot</span><span>. New York City can be considered just like a "salad bowl".</span>
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
Explanation:
nasaan po ba ang kuwento pasensya na kung walang sagot
<span>The cerebrum has the capability of being able to carry out tasks with the use of the four lobes that is divided into it with specific actions. This is also responsible for sensory integration, planning and even memory in which is one way of explaining as to how an individual can figure out in explaining the answers of the question that the teacher gave him or her.</span>
Answer:
preventing individual states from having their own currencies.
Explanation:
In the text shown above, Madison discourages allowing individual currencies for each state. He believes that this would weaken trade in the union, in addition to creating strife between the trade established between the states, which would be highly damaging to the country as a whole.
According to Madison, the ideal would be for a single currency to be established throughout the union, this could be done with the ratification of the constitution, which would establish the poribition of individual currencies for each state, but a national currency that should be used by everyone in the territory national.
