Answer:
b. The researcher has not ruled out the possibility that Y might cause X
Explanation:
In the given system, there is a theory that shows the relationship between the variables 'X' and 'Y'. The variable 'X' shows life satisfaction in a given population while the variable 'Y' shows how stable a democratic institution is. Therefore, the occurrence of the variable 'Y' can lead to the occurrence of the variable 'X'.
The cases sweatt v. painter and mclaurin v. oklahoma state regents expanded the right to equal education.
<h3>What was Oklahoma State Regents?</h3>
This was a supreme court case which prohibited racial segregation in state supported educational institution.
This case was similar to the one of Sweatt v. Painter which expanded the right to equal education hence option D was chosen.
Read more about Oklahoma State Regents here brainly.com/question/12101420
#SPJ4
Hypothesis is the correct answer.
A hypothesis is an idea or explanation created to explain a particular situation or condition. It's an unapproved theory that is given based on very limited evidence. Thus, when Mr. and Mrs. Hill say that their kids should pursue certain careers based on the assumption that men are good at Math and women are good at writing, their message best reflects what we know as a hypothesis.
B? I believe so. Good Luck!
The rising of the car industry made standard oil rise, They new that cars needed this to function, if they didn't have this then they wouldn't have cars.
Hope this helps!
