1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babymother [125]
3 years ago
5

Briefly summarize the imbalance of power (between the U.S. national gov't and the states) under the Articles of Confederation, t

hen describe in detail how this was resolved by the new power balance of the 1787 Constitution, with the Bill of Rights (1789) adding a further level of protection.
Social Studies
1 answer:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation was an agreement within the 13 states in accepting the us as confederation of sovereign states and created it's 1st constitution. The articles allowed the Continental Congress to run the revolutionary war, perform diplomacy within Europe, print money, and find out territorial issues.

However, the articles created a weak government and one house legislature congress wasn't allowed to tax and do any type or foreign trade. It left the govt to be short in money and therefore the people were allowed to manage their own trade.

In 1787, the state delegates called to revise the articles of confederation, called the Constitutional Convention. Congress of Confederation was the new governing body.

In 1775 colonies started calling themselves states and creating new constitutions. They wanted bicameral state legislatures, strong executive leaders, less restriction on the people, and continuance of established religions by the state. Also people wanted less restricted voting or holding office requirements.

With the assistance of Hamilton et al. the constitution was created. The constitution tried to limit the power of the govt and distribute it into the checks and balances. People didn't want to simply accept the constitution because the bill of rights limited the government's power, provide a constitutional reassurance the people would keep their rights and liberty.

You might be interested in
Social Darwinism goes with hobbes or Locke
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:  Hobbes

Explanation:

Personally, I think it a bit unfair to link Hobbes with the views of Herbert Spencer, who put forth the theory that became known as "Social Darwinism."  I would cite also an article by Peter Amato in <em>Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy</em> (Vol. 6 2002).  But if the choice is between Hobbes and Locke, it's easier to make a "Social Darwinism" comparison or connection with the theories of Hobbes.

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

The part of Hobbes that would have a similarity to Social Darwinism is that idea that humans by nature are each looking out for their own interest.  "Survival of the fittest" was the term that Herbert Spencer used in applying evolutionary theory to how human beings in society and different human societies function toward one another.  In "Progress: Its Law and Its Cause"( 1857), Herbert Spencer wrote:  "The advance from the simple to the complex, through a process of successive differentiations ... is seen in the evolution of Humanity, whether contemplated in the civilized individual, or in the aggregation of races; it is seen in the evolution of Society in respect both of its political and economical organization."  In his book, <em>Principles of Biology </em>(1864), Spencer stated even more fully the idea of humans being in competition with each other by nature, with the strongest forms surviving.  He wrote:  "This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."

7 0
3 years ago
You will get 34 points if you answer plz im timed!!!!
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What do we call trying to get a politician or public official to vote your way on an issue?
RoseWind [281]
Answer. Vetoing......
6 0
3 years ago
Match these items. Part A1. all revelation from God 2. intuitive understanding3. depends on illumination 4. God-breathed 5. a fo
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Explanation:

1) All revelation from God                             incomplete

2)intuitive understanding                            conscience

3)depends on illumination                           interpretation  

4)God-breathed                                              theopneustos

5 ) a formal defense                                         apologetic

6)no error                                                             inerrancy    

7 )natural revelation                                               validity

8 )study of the Bible itself                                     Biblioligy

9 )Old Testament appearance of Christ              theophany

10)truth or soundness                                             perfect

7 0
2 years ago
In the first election, most of the citizens of the US could vote. true or false ?​
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Unfortunately, leaving election control to individual states led to unfair voting practices in the U.S. At first, white men with property were the only Americans routinely permitted to vote. President Andrew Jackson, champion of frontiersmen, helped advance the political rights of those who did not own property.

It is NOT true. Please pick braliest. <3

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help with number 14 it's social studies but I really need help!
    5·1 answer
  • Can you use a person's first name in second reference of a press release
    7·1 answer
  • Which program created during President Johnson's administration focuses on providing health coverage to the elderly? Medicare or
    12·2 answers
  • which of the follow best describes the factors that led to successful agriculture within Mesopotamia?
    14·1 answer
  • Mr. and Mrs. Smith are expecting their first child. Mrs. Smith had an ultrasound and the technician described that the lungs, he
    9·1 answer
  • Which battle had nearly equal Japanese and American casualties?
    6·2 answers
  • When an organization uses a generic evaluation form which can be used for any job in the organization and the form does not prov
    11·1 answer
  • How did combat change in WWI as compared to previous wars?
    15·1 answer
  • This newspaper was printed in Houston, Texas, in 1982. It could BEST be used in a report on which of these topics?
    11·1 answer
  • What is meant by conflict​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!