Answer:
When taking out of natural habitat and put into an unfamiliar habitat several adaptations and behavioral changes can occur; however, it would depend on circumstances. Compare and contrast.
Explanation:
If you are provided with adequate medical, shelter, food, water, and access to leave whenever to seek these some of these luxury's than adaptation and behavioral changes would be the lesser. However, granted that you just go there with nothing you would would have to fight for survival - to live peacefully. You would have to adapt to your surroundings by learning to camouflage to avoid predators, you would have to learn to hunt for food and water, adapt to the sounds because of your sensory system will be off, you would have to be able build a shelter and learn ways to adapt to the climate. Eventually your body will adapt to withstand the many diseases, the food, and climate of the amazon rain-forest.
Behavioral changes of aggressiveness and alertness can be seen at an elevated level with having to prey and avoid predators -Darwin's survival of the fittest. The behavioral changes go along side with having to shift foraging patterns to avoid predators. Environmental changes can impair sensory systems or interfere with the physiological process which can weaken the ability of survival it can either make you paranoid or you can adapt; thus, changing your behavioral response.
Hope this helps!
A: Incomplete dominance!
Incomplete dominance is when a dominant allele doesn’t completely mask the effects of the other. The organism, as a result, will show a blending of both.
Your answer is (B.)
Fossils in newer layers if rock are generally estimated to be younger than fossils found in the deeper layers because it is closest to the surface. The soil and earth didn't have enough time to "bury" the remains of the dead animal ( Bury is used for a simpler term) underground. The farther down a fossil is the more likely it is older unless the animal tends to burrow. Seeing as the question is probably talking of older animals that is unlikely for an animal to burrow that far. So your answer is B.