Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
I think it would be economic system so a.
The north of the US did not want slavery while the south did want slavery. they had a war over it (the civil war) the north won and slavery was abolished.
The correct answer is foot-in-the-door phenomenon.
This means that if a person agrees to comply with a small favor, they are likely to do something more as well. So, these people will listen to the telemarketers' pitches, which means that they might even buy the product afterwards.
Maybe because the Buddha set examples to his people of how to live in the form of art. Also, maybe because some people worship the Buddha as a statue and making a statue is n the form of art.
