1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksi-84 [34.3K]
3 years ago
8

Something about Christmas

Social Studies
2 answers:
Marat540 [252]3 years ago
8 0
Santa Comes And You Spend Time With Family And Pray For Jesus
Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago
7 0
There’s really no evidence that Jesus was born on 25 of December.
You might be interested in
how does a person's worldview might impact the type of leadership or government they want in a society?​
ziro4ka [17]
Because when someone gets famous they’ll want you too believe in yourself because they been through the same pain you have been in
7 0
3 years ago
If research continues to indicate that the SAT is biased against students from low socio-economic backgrounds and does not refle
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

<u>It means that the test would have high reliability and not so for the validity.</u>

Explanation:

Even though the test may have reliabiltiy because it can be consistent in some of the structure of evaluation. This doesn't mean that it would be a valid test, because it is biased.

The psychometrc propertes are measured both by validity and reliabiltiy. This means the score can be reliable but as it is biased, it is not reflecting the knowlede and skills so it loses it's validity.

7 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
In a market economy how are economic decisions made
ollegr [7]

Answer:

consumers and market

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What exchange took place between the Indians and the Pilgims​
USPshnik [31]

Answer: There was the Thanksgiving meal and then there was also the The Pilgrim-Wampanoag peace treaty. I hope one of these two answers work for you.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One way to cut down on the number of elections is to not have an election when all the persons running are _____, which happens
    9·2 answers
  • Although forbidden prior to Georgia becoming a royal colony, wealthy planters began importing slaves into the region. As a resul
    7·2 answers
  • Why does washington view dealings with europe as a potential threat to the U.S.?
    7·1 answer
  • Wht did the americans not want a king in charge of
    8·1 answer
  • Expressways are known as controlled-access roadways because:
    8·2 answers
  • What was Hurst Nation
    10·1 answer
  • The first African American to serve on Birmingham city council
    9·1 answer
  • Third parties form in opposition to the two dominant parties. Describe three vital roles that third parties have played
    14·2 answers
  • A sentence using Authenticity
    5·1 answer
  • A visiting lecturer says that our perception brings us into contact with the environment in order to interact with and adapt to
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!