1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
6

Why is legal equality important to the free enterprise system?

History
2 answers:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
7 0

The other person was right, he can't give you a word for word answer when he doesn't have anything to choose from. However the word for word answer is "Guaranteeing all people the same legal rights will maximize the use of human capital."


andriy [413]3 years ago
4 0
All people have the same legal rights.
You might be interested in
Why are there 2 political parties in America
satela [25.4K]
The 2 political parties in America is Democrats and Republican
7 0
3 years ago
What were some of the consequences of the open door policy?
Vikki [24]
The open door policy impacts lasted for decades and they have three major impacts; increase Chinese backlash against foreigners. Chinese and American conflict with Japan. Increased US interest in East Asia
7 0
2 years ago
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the Cold War most affect Florida ?
solmaris [256]
Well Florida had a lot of cold weather and only once did it snow. Can you believe that?
3 0
3 years ago
Which country had lsot the most territory to whichcountry?
natulia [17]
It is either Hungary or Poland if they are both answers choose Hungary

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the patriots feel during the boston massacre
    14·2 answers
  • A Confederation is a loose union of states, with a weak central government a strong alliance of states a loose union of countrie
    9·1 answer
  • This term is generally used to describe producers of illegal drugs in Latin America who band together to keep the prices- and su
    12·1 answer
  • How does the U.S. Supreme Court affect the rights of citizens? It can take away the rights of citizens by ruling laws unconstitu
    15·2 answers
  • How did Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcom X differ in their approaches to gaining civil rights? A. Malcom X believed that f
    14·2 answers
  • HEYYYYYYY
    10·2 answers
  • Necesito saber el orden cronológico de esto:
    9·1 answer
  • What is one of the most important beliefs in Hinduism
    5·1 answer
  • What was an unintended negative consequence of affordable housing in the suburbs? 1 People were forced to spend more money in ne
    5·1 answer
  • Can anyone give me some similarities between field slaves and house slaves?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!