Explanation:
In the case of the complements goods, if the price of the soda rises, the demand would be decreased and the supply would rises. Since the soda and pizza are complementary goods so the impact of one good would be the same for another good also
Moreover, we also know that the price and the demand has an inverse relationship but the price and the supply has a direct relationship
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
The elasticity is about 1.43, and an increase in the price will cause hotels' total revenue to decrease
Explanation:
The formula of the midpoint for the variation of the quantity is 
and for the price is 
. With the variation of the price and the quantity the elasticity formula is ΔQ/ΔP. Replacing the elasticity is -1.43
The price elasticity of the demand is bigger than 1, that means that the demand is elastic, every increase of the price will cause a bigger decrease of the quantity, the revenue will drop because the increase of the price do not compansete the decrease of the quantity.
The term is "selection".
Paul B. Baltes was a German therapist whose expansive scientific plan was dedicated to building up and advancing the life-span orientation of human advancement. He was likewise a scholar in the field of the psychology of aging. Baltes was born in 1939 and died in 2006 at the age of sixty-seven.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true because the Federal Trade commission(FTC) analyze and investigate a seller or sellers who may be so cooperative as to make agreements that ensure large amounts of profit for them which is likely harmful and exploitative to consumers . FTC investigates business mergers which may be horizontal or vertical that are likely done for the purpose of increasing market share and fostering a sort of monopoly of the market. However, mergers and cooperation among businesses in the market do not always yield a monopoly and the FTC may be wrong(sometimes) to wave mergers that could increase the quality of goods or services in a market
