-$264,000
Explanation:
Below is a summary of the net cash flows from investing operations for the year.
flow of money from investments
Equipment purchase: $260,000
$87,000 was earned from the sale of equipment.
Land purchase: $91,000
-$264,000 in net cash flow was utilised for investing activities.
Sales are a cash inflow, so they would be added, whereas the purchase is a cash outflow, so it would be reflected as a minus sign.
To learn more about cash flows from the given link.
brainly.com/question/735261
#SPJ4
Answer:
<u>a. Zero dividend.</u>
<u>b. 3.5 new shares</u>;
<em>texes will be paid.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
a. March 20 is a date earlier than when the dividends are too be paid on April 18, and as such Wilfred Nadeau<em> will not</em> receive any dividend if he sells his stocks since he no longer has ownership of them.
b. 45 cents dividends per 300 stocks of Wilfred is $135 (reinvestment dividend plan).
With a discount of 3.4% at $39.8 (3.4%*39.8) current price per stock makes the total cost per stock after discount= $38.4.
Dividing the reinvestment dividend plan over the discounted price (135/38.4) = 3.5 new shares, According to the requirements of law the investor must still pay tax annually on his or her dividend income, whether it is received as cash or reinvested.
Answer:
A joint venture (JV) is not a partnership. That term is reserved for a single business entity that is formed by two or more people. Joint ventures join two or more different entities into a new one, which may or may not be a partnership.
Hope it helps
Answer:
$218,400
Explanation:
The computation of contribution margin is here below:-
Units Cost per unit Total
Sales 6,000 $88 $528,000
Less:
Variable production cost 6,000 $40.8 $244,800
Variable selling and
administrative costs 6,000 $10.8 $64,800
Contribution margin $218,400
Therefore the we multiplied the sale unit with cost per unit, in the similar way we multiplied the Variable production cost unit with cost per unit and Variable selling and administrative costs with cost per unit to reach the contribution margin.
Answer:
"The face of the instrument"
Explanation:
This is a legal phrase which means the contract (aka the "instrument") must be read "on its face." Basically, you should put everything you want the contract to say in plain language and the parties are only held to the plain, common understanding of exactly what is written down.
The idea is that no party can go back and say that something else is expected or implied from the contract unless it is actually written down.
