Technological innovations like desalination allowed people living in areas without adequate freshwater sources to adapt to their environment because desalination allows people to live, grow food, and mine natural resources in regions without many freshwater resources.
Desalination is that the process of removing salts or other minerals and contaminants from seawater, brackish water, and wastewater effluent and it's an increasingly common solution to get water for human consumption and for domestic/industrial utilization.
Desalination uses reverse osmosis technology to remove water molecules from seawater.
Desalination could be a process that takes away mineral elements from saline water.
The process is named "desalination", and it's being employed more and more round the world to grant people with needed freshwater.
To know more about Desalination here
brainly.com/question/26016496
#SPJ4
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
After each legislative election the party<span> that wins the most representatives is designated the "</span>majority<span>" in each house, and the other </span>party<span> is called the "</span>minority<span>. ... Next, when each house convenes in its first session, </span>Congressional<span> leaders, such as the Speaker of the House and the </span>Majority<span> Leader in the</span>Senate<span>, are selected ...
</span>
Answer:
heres a quick summary: The sun is a deadly lazer! never mind theres a blanket now! the blanket was made up of GAS and OTHER STUFF
Explanation:
Answer:
(A) Egypt
Explanation:
Suez Crisis was the invasion of the Egypt in the late 1956 by the Israel which was followed by the United Kingdom and the France. After fighting had started, the political pressure from United States, Soviet Union and United Nations led to the withdrawal by three invaders.
Nasser officially recognized People's Republic of China on 16 May 1956, which angered U.S. and Secretary Dulles which was a sponsor of Republic of China.This move was then coupled with impression that project was beyond the Egypt's economic capabilities and caused the Eisenhower to withdraw all the American financial aid for Aswan Dam project on 19 July.
