Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
Economic model does imply to Health care require money to implement
For example, when we discuss health care plan, topic such as how do we obtain money purchase the necessary drugs or how to pay the medical professional is unavoidable. Because of this, we need also discuss the type of economic model that used by a country before we determine the type of health care that fit into the model.
<span>A lecture and a dialogue that allow participants to share experiences in a particular field is known as a Seminar
a Seminar commonly had a person or more that act as the 'speaker'. These speakers are the individuals that had more experiences and expertise regarding a certain topics or issue compared to the audiences</span>