a. The pattern of the confirmation votes for the nominees shows that most nominees favor the president's political inclinations and thoughts, while those whose nominations were not confirmed happened when the Senate majority did not come from the president's party.
There are <em>no noticeable </em>exceptions to the pattern of the confirmation votes, which tend to indicate that the party in the majority in the Senate usually confirms the nominees more than the party in the minority.
b. The confirmation votes have always followed a predictable pattern. When the president's political party aligns with the Senate majority party, most nominees are confirmed, sometimes without much debate.
Thus, we can conclude that the president's political party and the majority party in the Senate always influence the confirmation of the nominees or their rejection, as the case may be.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/19243990
Before the revolution there was no freedom and democracy and equality in the country. There were rich nobles and the king and the common people lived in bad conditions and in poverty. They were not free because the law did not apply equally to everyone and the king was ruining the country. French revolution was based on enlightenment ideals which claimed that liberty was one of the basic human rights and since they did not have it they decided to take it by force from the king. Of course, when the revolution happened, the people who were in charge pretended that the country was a democracy but it was rather a type of a dictatorship where people were politically prosecuted and punished often by death. The people were however free since they had things like constitutions and laws but it wasn't a complete democracy.
In Muslim worlds it used to be a lot less violent. now there are bombs blowing up all over the world. but we used to be at peace with them now we are at war
