I assume your question is why does he have to leave the room before the final discussion?
Well, he might have, as an active member of the IRB, a conflict of interest, meaning that he could be biased to vote in favor of his work which is incorrect, as researchers need to be objective regarding what they are studying. The National Academy Press. (2009). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Is a great book you might read to understand the duties of any IRB and its members responsibilities, also the researchers' behavior. On it, is detail why a conflict of interest can guide to the decision of not conducting a certain research, independently of the undeniable reputation of Dr. Jones.
Those actions is considered as harassment.
People who became the 'victim' of the joke has the basis ground to bring the case to the court under 'Hostile work environment' harassment law.
In united states, this type of case could cost the company a loss of $12,000 in Average cases.
Is it dynasty? im not sure though
With some meat balls as well? & a side of breadsticks
