Answer:
a)
To my view, the MD viewpoint is better. In companies the existing process is usually analyzed and the pain points identified whenever there is a need for change. The new system is simply a change to the existing system. The stakeholders' specific needs are not completely addressed. The MD calls for a collection of and analysis of demands from scratch to share its needs , requirements and inhibitions between the principal stakeholders. The CIO and their staff would be able to assess in the requirements review process what worked and what did not work well for the organization.
In assessing the current process, the CIO and his team will align their thinking process with the pain points and correct the existing system. They are not going to build the system in a fresh light. A new system that meets the needs of stakeholders can be developed. For everybody, this is a win-win situation. The point of view of MD is therefore more logical and related.
b)
In the particular case, the most logical and comprehensive system analysis method is:
Primary stakeholder requirements collection: Primary stakeholders using the system must be consulted on their specific requirements and needs. It is also necessary to consider the limitations identified by stakeholders.
Comprehension of existing system and pain points: the current system can be analysed based on requirements collection and pain points can be emphasized in the current system.
A new system that will win for everyone: the new system must primarily comply with the needs of the stakeholders.
Presentation and approval of the system blueprint to stakeholders
Development and implementation of the system: system development can be carried out by the agile method of sprinting.
Monitoring and control of the system: to check for performance deviations, the system implemented should be observed. In order to monitor deviations, specific intervention can be implemented.
The adjust row amounts feature helps in creating Quick books accountant budgets as it makes updating budgets much faster and allows for consistency and easy use.
Now you'll start making adjustments. If you're starting your budget from scratch, and therefore the monthly amount is the same, you'll be able to enter the primary month. Then click “Copy Across” and therefore the amount will populate for the complete year. Or, if you have already got data from a previous year, you'll be able to click “Adjust Row Amounts” and choose to extend or decrease the monthly amount by a particular amount or percentage. This makes updating budgets much faster and allows for consistency and easy use.
The adjust row amounts feature helps in creating Quick books accountant budgets as it makes updating budgets much faster and allows for consistency and easy use.
To learn more about this Quick Books Accountants Budgets, visit the following link:
brainly.com/question/24441347
#SPJ4
<span>One
firm that is historically low and deals with negatively correlated stock
markets is Gold Extraction Companies. They are have very low correction with
overall stock markets. The basic reason for this low correlation is that, as
the stock market become bearish, investor sentiment becomes weak, due to which
most of the investors withdraw their money from stock market. Now once investor
has withdrawn the money from stock market , they search on safe investments
which will provide them good reruns, Gold is one of the investment which is
relatively safe and provide high returns. Thus withdrawn money from the share
market is invested in gold by investors. Thus Gold prices and companies related
to extraction of gold have very less correlation to the gold.</span>
Answer:
I d speak this language sorry <3
Answer: decreases
Explanation: The following practice is done by the central bank in the situation of inflation when there is an excess supply of money in the economy.
The central bank tries to decrease the funds by selling the govt bonds to the banks. This results in decrease in funds from banks as they have to buy such bonds from their respective funds.
