Spheres of influence would be referring to the influence that a superpower has on countries under its sphere. In the 1900s, China was under the influence of the British. Under the rule of the British, the British set rules for what the Chinese were allowed to trade and produce. They also were the ones who set rules as to who can trade with China. This is one of the reasons that lead to the Opium war. Western imperialism was rampant during that time and Britain was one of the superpowers.
Answer:
spatial study of natural phenomena that make up the environment, such as rivers, mountains, landforms, weather, climate, soils, plants, and any other physical aspects of the earth’s surface. Physical geography focuses on geography as a form of earth science.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
Option C: the act of using others' ideas without proper documentation or by paraphrasing poorly.
Explanation:
Plagiarism is simply the use of someone's own work, content or research and taking it as your own without acknowledging the owner or author. It is reproduction of someone else's work without proper reference or attribution. It involves passing it off as one's own. The research on others ideas is not bad but when you commit the act of using others' ideas without proper documentation or by paraphrasing poorly is plagiarism.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
