Could a reflection followed by a rotation ever be described as a single rotation?

1 answer:

8 0

No, if you do that it would be rotating twice not a single rotation

You might be interested in

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

i have this same question. im sorry but i don't get it either. sorry..

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

amm1812

X=6 you need to multiply by 2

7 0

4 years ago

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

i think its either that or (-5,-5)

5 0

3 years ago

Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

2st

Step-by-step explanation:

because only 34 can be divided by 17 and there arent enough of s and ts

6 0

2 years ago

lianna [129]

(9x - 7) - (5x + 10 )
2x - 15x
- 13x

7 0

3 years ago