Answer:
72/8=9. 9 is the correct answer
Egypt's geography (being in a deserty place with a big river nearby which helped facilitate agriculture and transport/trade) did indeed have an influence in their achievements. Most notably, they had to learn how to use the flooding of the river Nile which occured every summer to their advantage, so that they could reap proper harvests each year :)
Im pretty sure its D becuase it makes the most sense to me.
The correct answer is the fundamental attribution error.
Fundamental attribution error (FAE) refers to the phenomenon in which we attribute others' behavior to their disposition (personality) and their abilities, intelligence and skills (or their lack thereof), while attributing our own behavior to situational factors outside our control (bad weather, a harsh teacher, an unforeseen event, etc.). An instance of FAE is failing an exam. If we fail an exam we are much more likely to attribute it to situational factors (the exam was unfairly hard, the teacher graded it unfairly, etc.). On the other hand if another person fails an exam we are much more likely to attribute it to factors internal to him or her- he/ she did not study hard enough, he/she is not intelligent and is incompetent.
Answer:
The analogical dialogue adds to the real dialogue the imaginative, transcendent facet, loaded with symbolic and connotative elements, bringing us closer to the multi-semantic nature of the concepts. Analogy, as an imaginative and creative resource, adds liveliness, fantasy.
Explanation:
The knowledge and use of analog processes results in the improvement of the four areas of language proficiency for the following reasons. In the first place, they promote the objectification of thought since analogical elaboration requires reflection and this, in turn, allows the appropriation of knowledge and facilitates its communicability. In this way, the territory of mere solipsistic speculation is abandoned and becomes a true mechanism of representation and transformation, that is, it places the subject in a reality capable of being modified. Likewise, it evidences the argumentative capacity of the issuer and opens the capacity for dialogue between thought and individual, between individual and reality and between subjects.
When the analogy is established, the narrow gates of human experience are opened, they are resized, they are given depth by revealing non-apparent meanings thanks to the relationship between essentially different beings. It is necessary to emphasize this last benefit, the analogy manages to surprise because it reveals contents that in a first examination may not be perceivable, but that unquestionably conform to the message and when not perceived, impose themselves on the receiver, leaving it at the mercy of the purpose of the message itself, locating it in a territory where questioning, dialogue or criticism are unlikely.
