TechSmart managers are implementing distributive justice.
<h3>What is distributive justice?</h3>
Employees experience distributive justice when they think that results are fair. These results can be measurable, like pay, or intangible, like appreciative remarks. In the event that staff members feel fairly compensated or handled, distributive justice is achieved. When equal effort does not result in equal rewards or when a person or group obtains an excessive amount of goods, distributive justice is lacking.
When equals enjoy the same distribution of benefits, distributive justice has unquestionably been attained. In a constitutional democracy, governmental policies that guarantee social security or healthcare to all retirees and the old are examples of distributive justice.
Learn more about distributive justice here:
brainly.com/question/17510777
#SPJ4
Answer:
A normative statement is one that makes a value judgment. Such a judgment is the opinion of the speaker; no one can prove that the statement is or is not correct
Explanation:
Answer:
annual withdrawals is $1,393.87
Explanation:
given data
Amount Deposited = $5,000
Annual Interest Rate = 7.2%
First withdrawal = 2020
last withdrawal = 2025
solution
we consider equal sized annual withdrawals = x
so we can say that Amount Deposited amount will be as
$5,000 = 
..........1
we take common here 
so
$5,000 = 
solve it we get
x = $1,393.87
so that annual withdrawals is $1,393.87
GDP is the sum of all final goods and services produced by an economy in a given period. In calculating GDP only the final goods and services that are traded are accounted for. Thus, household services that do not generate income are not accounted for in GDP, only productive activities. Therefore, in the long run the tendency is that the GDP analyzed by this issue will decrease, because when the unemployment rate increases, fewer workers will be employed in the productive sector. These people may substitute work for leisure or household chores, but this will not count in GDP.
Answer:
She was involved in objectionable self-dealing.
Explanation:
Wendy was the president of a business, which made the product she started to make individually at her home, after learning it from the business.
That clearly reflects that the business might have provided the knowledge to Wendy, but using that knowledge in benefit of the self and not of the company, is a unethical act on the part of the individual.
Here Wendy the president of company, rather than promoting the products of the company promoted the products she manufactured individually at her home. This clearly proves that she is self oriented in a negative manner which is a loss for the company.
Her acts are objectionable.
