Answer:
Not being told the truth by the government.
Explanation:
Answer:
Suitable climate and strong military.
Explanation:
Suitable climate of the region motivated Turkish people to expand so far from their original homeland. Turkish people needs suitable environment where vegetation is present for their animals which is limited in their former homeland. They were so successful in creating new states because of their strong military and bravery, the enemies were defeated and the Turks capturing new states.
The phrase "chariot kingdoms became important naval powers to defend their coasts" sums up the situation following the Sea Peoples' assaults the best.
<h3>Was Egypt destroyed by the Sea Peoples?</h3>
During and before the Late Bronze Age collapse, the Sea Peoples, a fictitious seafaring confederation, are thought to have attacked ancient Egypt and other places in the East Mediterranean (1200–900 BCE).
<h3>The Sea People who assaulted Egypt were who?</h3>
This time, they are categorized as "foreign countries" in the inscription and are clearly identified as Sea Peoples: the Pele group, Trekker, Shekels, Deneen, and Washes. They set their camp at Amor and dispatched an army to the Nile. Once more, the pharaoh was standing by to greet them.
<h3>How did the sea people fare?</h3>
Just as mysteriously as they appeared, the Sea People of the Bronze Age vanished. There are no records of them anywhere after their defeat by the hands of Ramesses III in 1178 BC. Some people think they blended with the existing society.
To know more about Sea People visit:
brainly.com/question/1998144
#SPJ9
The correct option is C. In the case of Rochin Vs California, Rochin, a suspected narcotic pusher, was induced against his will in the hospital by the police in order to make him vomit the capsules he had swallowed. The supreme court considered this a violation of human right under due process clause of the 14th Amendment.
Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.
Context/explanation:
Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.
While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.
Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.
