1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
omeli [17]
3 years ago
11

Is y=4 direct variation

Mathematics
1 answer:
soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No.

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for a direct variation equation is y=kx so therefore that would be an indirect variation. Hope this helped ya mate!

You might be interested in
4. An object is at rest if all forces
algol13

Answer:

+5.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets say you have an apple and you apply -5.5 newtons of force to it, for it to be balanceds you have to push the opposite, which is +5.5 newtons.

3 0
2 years ago
Laura red 312 page book in 13 hours if she read the same number of pages each hour how many pages did she read i
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

24 pg per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 312 by 13, and the result will be 24. Hope it helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP 15 points!! Todd has created the following diagram to prove the Pythagorean theorem. He drew right ABC with leg leng
masya89 [10]

Answer:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2. Hope this helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 11 inch by 8 inch piece of cardboard squares cut out of the corners and is folded up to make up an open-top-box. If the volume
Arada [10]
<h3>Answer:  b. either 2.5 inches or about .716 inches</h3>

=====================================================

Work Shown:

I have attached two images below. The first shows figures 1 through 4. The second image shows figure 5.

Start with figure 1. Work your way left to right, top to bottom til you get to figure 4. This is the basic process to turn a flat piece of cardboard into a 3D folded box.

The dashed lines in figure 1 are x inches long.

Figure 2 is the result of cutting out the dashed lines you see in figure 1.

When you fold along the dashed lines in figure 2, you'll end up with something similar to figure 3.

Figure 4 is the completed open-top-box. In other words, this box does not have a lid.

The green portions in figures 3 and 4 indicate where the flaps used to be in reference to figure 2.

-------------------

Since those dashed lines in figure 1 were x inches long, this means that the distance from A to B is 11-x-x = 11-2x inches long.

This makes segment BD to be 8-2x inches long. We are subtracting off 2 copies of x each time for each dimension.

------------------

length = AB = 11-2x

width = BD = 8-2x

Since we want the length to be positive, this means 11-2x > 0 which solves to x < 5.5

Since we want the width to be positive, this means 8-2x > 0 which solves to x < 4

Overall, we must make x < 4 to make both inequalities 11-2x > 0 and 8-2x > 0 to be true at the same time.

Furthermore, x is some length itself, so it cannot be negative either. Therefore x > 0 or 0 < x

Combine 0 < x and x < 4 to get 0 < x < 4

The restriction 0 < x < 4 will be used later.

------------------

For now, let's compute the volume.

Volume = Length*Width*Height

Volume = (AB)*(BD)*x

Volume = (11-2x)*(8-2x)*x

Volume = (88-22x-16x+4x^2)*x

Volume = (88-38x+4x^2)*x

Volume = 88x-38x^2+4x^3

This is the algebraic way of representing the volume in terms of the cut length x

We want this volume to be 45 cubic inches. We set  88x-38x^2+4x^3 equal to 45 and solve for x

88x-38x^2+4x^3 = 45

4x^3-38x^2+88x-45 = 0

At this point we try to factor by grouping or we turn to a calculator. Cubics are often very difficult to solve by hand, so I recommend using a calculator (unless you can quickly spot how to factor by grouping, but I don't see a quick way of doing that). Note: based on the answer choices that aren't whole numbers (assuming choice C is a non-answer), this heavily implies we do not have rational roots, and therefore factoring over the rationals will be impossible. In other words, the answer choices tell us to immediately use a graphing calculator to find the roots.

Using geogebra (see figure 5), I find the three approximate roots to be

x = 0.716 (shown as point A)

x = 2.5 (point B)

x = 6.284 (point C)

Recall that earlier we made 0 < x < 4. The first two roots satisfy this inequality, but x = 6.284 is outside this range. So we ignore it. It looks like your teacher put 6.284 as a trick answer in choice A.

5 0
3 years ago
(3x2 - 6x + 2) - (4x2 – 3x - 2)
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]

Answer:

-5x+4

Step-by-step explanation:

(3x*2x-6x+2)-(4x*2x-3x-2)

(3*2x-6x+2)-(4*2x-3x-2)

(6x-6x+2)-(8x-3x-2)

answer:

-5x+4

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If (8^2)p = 8^4, what is the value of p?
    5·1 answer
  • How do you add fractions
    11·2 answers
  • What is the abbreviation for SI unit of mass
    14·2 answers
  • While Edward was visiting his sister in Westminster, he bought a toothbrush that was marked down 80% from an original price of $
    5·1 answer
  • Need Help ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • Estimate each product 5/7×1/9=
    9·1 answer
  • -5(-3)(-3) what the product
    8·2 answers
  • The base sales tax rate in Florida is 6%,
    8·1 answer
  • The sum of the ages of two sisters is 36. The younger sister is 6 more than a fifth of the older sister's age. How old is each s
    7·1 answer
  • Florida Company (FC) and Minnesota Company (MC) are both service companies. Their stock returns for the past three years were as
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!