If in the process of calculating gdp, the market value of all intermediate goods is added to the market value of all final goods, this would: overstate the actual value of GDP.
<h3>What is meant by GDP?</h3>
This is the term that has to do with the Gross domestic product. It is the amount of goods and services that are produced in a given economy at a particular period of time which could be in one year.
We have to conclude that If in the process of calculating gdp, the market value of all intermediate goods is added to the market value of all final goods, this would: overstate the actual value of GDP.
Read more on GDP here: brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ1
Answer:
120 seconds (2 minutes)
Explanation:
Standard time = normal time + allowances
The normal time is computed using the following formula
normal time = observed time X ratings/100
observed time mean = (84+76+80+84+76)/5 = 80
A person who is 25% faster has a rating of 125%
normal time = 80 X 125/100 = 100 seconds
Allowances is calculated as a percentage of normal time
Allowance = 80 X 20/100 = 20 seconds
Standard time = 100 + 20 = 120 seconds
Answer:
The correct net present value of the machine would be $86,400
Explanation:
For computing the net present value, the discount factor, yearly cash inflows are required.
In the question, it is already mentioned that Carlin ignores income taxes, and for depreciation, income tax is to be considered. So, automatically the depreciation is also not be considered in calculating part which means that the net present value would remain the same.
Answer:
d. reduce interest rates to shift aggregate demand right.
Explanation:
If the Federal Reserve supports the incumbent, they would want that she wins the election. In order to do so they may want to stimulate the economy.
To do so, they may reduce interest rates. This increases the opportunity cost of saving, and thus people instead of saving, will take their money out and spend it. Which in turns shifts the aggregate demand curve to the right.
Answer:
review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the step that you have completely neglected is to review your progress, reevaluate, and revise your plan. That is because in this scenario many events have occurred, and it seems that your financial plan after retirement has not been adjusted with each and every one of these life events. Therefore it is outdated and most likely not providing the benefits it once did.
