Answer:
The answer is right and left, respectively.
Explanation:
Trevor's right hemishphere is most active, as it processes visual information and is mostly in charge of creative thinking. A visual analogy requires the use of imagination and intuition, skills dominated by the right hemisphere.
Sienna's left hemisphere is most active, as it is responsible for logical thinking, language and sequencing. An oral presentation requires linear, organised thought, an ability driven by the left hemisphere.
Answer:
People watching their team lose important games often make faces, yell at the screen, and demonstrate general agitation. Although they aren't playing the game themselves, they may be able to experience the frustration felt by the players because of mirror neuron activity in the brain.
Explanation:
The mirror neuron system (MNS) is a network in the brain that activates when individuals start moving their body parts and watch the activity of another individual or animal. After researchers have found the effects of the mirror neuron on monkeys, a wide range of studies have analyzed its network and attributes in humans and animals.
Answer:
Remus wished to begin the city on the Aventine Hill, while Romulus favored the Palatine Hill. So as to choose which sibling was correct they consented to counsel divination, where fowls are inspected to perceive what the divine beings supported.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.