Yes , it’s true. In a known-plaintext attack (kpa), the cryptanalyst can only view a small portion of encrypted data, and he or she has no control over what that data might be.
The attacker also has access to one or more pairs of plaintext/ciphertext in a Known Plaintext Attack (KPA). Specifically, consider the scenario where key and plaintext were used to derive the ciphertext (either of which the attacker is trying to find). The attacker is also aware of what are the locations of the output from key encrypting. That is, the assailant is aware of a pair. They might be familiar with further pairings (obtained with the same key).
A straightforward illustration would be if the unencrypted messages had a set expiration date after which they would become publicly available. such as the location of a planned public event. The coordinates are encrypted and kept secret prior to the event. But when the incident occurs, the attacker has discovered the value of the coordinates /plaintext while the coordinates were decrypted (without knowing the key).
In general, a cipher is easier to break the more plaintext/ciphertext pairs that are known.
To learn more about Plaintext Attack click here:
brainly.com/question/28445346
#SPJ4
I'm pretty sure it's C) or D) because it seems those make the most sense because providing excitement does not matter if that is not their point, repeating a previous point is practically useless because that point has already been said.
Answer:
C. Byte pair encoding is an example of a lossless transformation because an encoded string can be restored to its original version.
Explanation:
Byte pair encoding is a form of encoding in which the most common pairs of consecutive bytes of data are replaced by a single byte which does not occur within the set of data.
For example, if we has a string ZZaaAb, it can be encoded if the pairs of string ZZ are replaced by X and the second pair by Y. So, our data now becomes XYAb.
To get our original data, that is decode it, we just replace the data with the keys X = ZZ and Y = aa thus allowing our original data to be restored.
Since our original string is restored without loss of data, it implies that <u>byte pair encoding is an example of a lossless transformation because an encoded string can be restored to its original version.</u>
The answer is a Scroll bar, the description fits perfectly because you need to move it to see more of the content you are viewing, and it wont be completely. when the item does appear completely on screen then the bar is relatively large and there is no need for scrolling, however the opposite occurs during when you cannot see all of it.
Answer:
it's most prolly a bug.The game crashes a lot tbh
