1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vampirchik [111]
3 years ago
10

LeQuient will be giving a sales presentation to a mixed audience and he wants to find out if the audience members are individual

istic or collectivistic. He is likely to conduct a(n) __________.
Business
2 answers:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

He is likely to conduct a Multicultural

Explanation:

Tomtit [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D) multicultural analysis

Explanation:

LeQuient is giving a sales presentation to a mixed audience, that means that his audience will include members of different cultural backgrounds. He wants to determine which sales approach to use and therefore needs to try to understand the cultural diversity and characteristics of the audience. The best way to do so is by performing a multicultural analysis, since members of different cultures tend to engage in different buying processes. For example, Latinos, African Americans and Asians tend to buy certain products considering the needs of their families (collectivistic), while non Latin whites (people with northern European backgrounds) are usually more individualistic.

You might be interested in
United Apparel has the following balances in its stockholders' equity accounts on December 31, 2021: Treasury Stock, $700,000; C
Sergio [31]

Answer and Explanation:

The preparation of stockholders' equity is shown below:-

Stockholder's equity Statement

December 31, 2021

Particulars                               Amount ($)

Paid-in capital  

Preferred Stock                      $2,100,000

Common Stock                       $450,000

Additional paid in capital       $7,300,000

Total paid in capital                $9,850,000

Add:Retained earnings           $1,450,000

sub total                                    $11,300,000

Less: Treasury stock                $700,000

Total stockholders' equity      $10,600,000

7 0
3 years ago
When a KAM determines whether a buyer is employing a new task, modified rebuy or straight rebuy decision-making process, what se
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

A) Type of Buying Situation

Explanation:

KAM refers to the Key Account Management and it represents an approach in product sales where the manufacturer or supplier of a product works in close contact with the consumer or client simply to get a better understanding of their common goals and also ensure that both parties achieve their objectives.

Since the objective of KAM is find out the buyer's goal or objective, the right choice is Type of Buying Situation.

Type of Buying Situation is an aspect of consumer behaviour monitoring where the actions of individuals, organisations or groups and their product decisions ranging from use, buying options, processes among others are studied. This is done buy manufacturers to better meet the need of the consumers and the society at large.

The new task being employed, the modified rebuy and straight rebuy options are Type of Buying Situation Major Decisions.

4 0
3 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not an advantage of the corporate form of business organization?
RoseWind [281]

Answer:

Easy to transfer ownership.

Explanation:

its ownership is easily transferable via the sale of shares of stock.

3 0
3 years ago
Tomika Corporation has current and accumulated earnings and profits of​ $0. Tomika distributes​ $10,000 to its sole​ shareholder
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

The answer is: A) 0$

Explanation:

If Tomika Corporation's current and accumulated earnings and profits was $0, the fact that it distributed $10,000 to Alana (sole shareholder) wouldn't change that number. The only thing that has changed in Tomika is the amount of equity.

For earnings and profits account to change, Tomika must make or lose some money doing business.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 34. Which of the following statements is correct? a. If oligopolists successfully collude, then their combined output will be eq
    6·1 answer
  • Red Corporation, which owns stock in Blue Corporation, had net operating income of $200,000 for the year. Blue pays Red a divide
    15·1 answer
  • The economic order quantity (EOQ) model is a classical model used for controlling inventory and satisfying demand. Costs include
    7·1 answer
  • During the employee selection process, the screening interview is often conducted by: the current workers in the applicant's dep
    9·1 answer
  • What percentage of business in America are home businesses?<br> A. 10%<br> B.33%<br> C.52%<br> D.67%
    12·2 answers
  • What was the target market for traditional advertisers
    15·1 answer
  • Once you purchase a house. It typically appreciates in value. Appreciation is
    11·1 answer
  • Division ABC has $750,000 in average assets and $200,000 in income. Division XYZ has $800,000 in average assets and $210,000 in
    10·1 answer
  • Curtis was recently laid off and was given severance pay on the condition that he agreed not to criticize the organization publi
    15·1 answer
  • You just paid $574,000 for an annuity that will pay you and your heirs $14,000 a year forever. what rate of return are you earni
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!