1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
4 years ago
5

Frank houser owns a football team that plays its home games at memorial stadium. to increase revenue he is offering a sponsorshi

p to durable goods, a company that makes sports equipment. durable goods wants to provide all of the team's equipment and pay $150,000 for the right to place its logo on the team's uniforms. currently, the team spends $108,000 on equipment annually. how much will frank profit by accepting the offer?
Mathematics
2 answers:
drek231 [11]4 years ago
6 0
The profit earned by Frank houser through accepting the sponsorship of another company is the difference between the amount that the company is to provide and the amount that is to be spent for the equipment.
                         Profit = $150,00 - $108,000
                           Profit = 42,000
stealth61 [152]4 years ago
3 0

$150,000 + $108,000 = $258,000

You might be interested in
Percent of students with brown eys
Over [174]

Answer:

between 55 to 79 percent

6 0
3 years ago
Find the slope of a line whose equation is 3X+6Y=9
Lisa [10]

To find the slope of the above equation, it is easiest to put it into slope-intercept form, y=mx + b, where the variable m represents the slope. To do this, we must isolate the variable y on the left side of the equation by using the reverse order of operations. First, we should subtract 3x from both sides of the equation.

3x + 6y = 9

6y = -3x + 9

Next, we should divide both sides of the equation by 6 to undo the coefficent of 6 on the variable y.

y = -1/2x + 3/2

Therefore, the slope of the line is -1/2 (the coefficient of the variable x in slope-intercept form).

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
Please show full solutions! WIll Mark Brainliest for the best answer. <br><br> SERIOUS ANSWERS ONLY
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

  • vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression)
  • reflection over the y-axis
  • horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion)
  • translation left 1 unit
  • translation up 3 units

Step-by-step explanation:

These are the transformations of interest:

  g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . . vertical scaling (expansion) by a factor of k

  g(x) = f(x) +k . . . . vertical translation by k units (upward)

  g(x) = f(x/k) . . . . . horizontal expansion by a factor of k. When k < 0, the function is also reflected over the y-axis

  g(x) = f(x-k) . . . . . horizontal translation to the right by k units

__

Here, we have ...

  g(x) = 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3

The vertical and horizontal transformations can be applied in either order, since neither affects the other. If we work left-to-right through the expression for g(x), we can see these transformations have been applied:

  • vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression) . . . 1/3f(x)
  • reflection over the y-axis . . . 1/3f(-x)
  • horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion) . . . 1/3f(-1/3x)
  • translation left 1 unit . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1))
  • translation up 3 units . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

The "working" is a matter of matching the form of g(x) to the forms of the different transformations. It is a pattern-matching problem.

The horizontal transformations could also be described as ...

  • translation right 1/3 unit . . . f(x -1/3)
  • reflection over y and expansion by a factor of 3 . . . f(-1/3x -1/3)

The initial translation in this scenario would be reflected to a translation left 1/3 unit, then the horizontal expansion would turn that into a translation left 1 unit, as described above. Order matters.

8 0
2 years ago
I'm studying for a test and got stuck on this problem. I took a screenshot !! Please help. I just need part C for number 5, I ge
Studentka2010 [4]
Alright, so for AB and CD to be parallel, CX and DX would have to be equal, as is with AX and BX. In addition, for CD and AB to be parallel, all sides in both triangles are either equal or not all sides in even one triangle are equal. Therefore, CD is not 3. In addition, two sides of a triangle combined must be greater than the third, so that leaves 5, 4, and 2 for CD. If it was 5, that would mean that all sides are equal, so that leaves 4 and 2. However, I don't see anything to prove either one right, sorry:/
8 0
3 years ago
I need help plz cmon
PolarNik [594]

Answer: 84

Step-by-step explanation:

4 x 21 is 84 a fraction can be simplified and be a whole number so if 84 divided by 4 it will be 21 if you want to write it as a fraction it will be 21/1 which is equal to 21

Did it help? :)

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is -5.76 rational or irrational
    14·1 answer
  • Is finding the value for the variable the only solution to real-world problems? Explain.
    14·2 answers
  • Two numbers total 61 and have a difference of 33. Find the two numbers
    7·1 answer
  • What is the value of the question mark?<br> 5/10=?/70
    8·2 answers
  • Help me please it’s hard
    10·2 answers
  • A rectangle has a length of 12 meters and a width of 400 centimeters. What is the perimeter,
    8·2 answers
  • How do you do circle theorems?
    11·2 answers
  • Larry works for a tree farmer and needs to plant new saplings (young trees). He can plant 27 saplings per hour. He needs to plan
    9·2 answers
  • A piece of fabric for a quilt design is in the shape of a parallelogram. The base is 5 in
    15·2 answers
  • 1. The spinner shown has six equal-size sections and is spun twice. What is the probability that the product of the number spun
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!