Answer:
A. Fish need light to see their food
Explanation:
B is incorrect because fish take in oxygen constantly to respirate. If they only took in oxygen when it was dark they would die.
C is incorrect because expelling CO2 is also a constant process as a part of the reactions that take part inside living organisms, so it happens constantly (a bit like B)
D is incorrect because plants need light for food (photosynthesis) and would most likely die or have stunted growth if left in the dark.
A is correct because when it is dark, fish rely on other senses to find food as most fish cannot see as well in the dark, therefore when they have light they can see their food more easily.
Hope this helped!
The correct answer is: If generation 3 had flock distributions similar to those shown in the graph below.
After the change in food, the beak phenotype changes in order to adapt. So, if fruit is removed, the phenotype of birds’ beaks should change according to the change in environment. The graph below shows that there is no change, so it wouldn’t support the hypothesis that food changes beak types.
Answer:It is known as a concentration gradient which in diffusion will always flow from ares of high concentration to areas of low concentrations
So i believe the answer to this is A.
Explanation:
