Answer:
Individuals end to continue paying the premiums of the automobile insurance as a habit. However, serious thoughts and putting in element of strategizing helps to reduce the premium in most cases. At times, there is a sudden like on the part of the insurer even for a flawless driver.
A good look up and research of the insurance websites can be of real help in comparing whether a better deal is offered by the other insurance companies, or whether a certain change in the policy or small adjustments of the term would give benefit to the customer.
In case a speeding ticket is received, or an accident is mentioned in the driving history, it is maintained there in for a period of three to five years. Thus, the premium increases substantially. A change of insurer is advised in such situations, where a major search for an insurer, who does not pay that much importance to these details, is to be carried on.
Again, having a teenager driver in the family calls for a caution as the insurance premium increases drastically in such occasion. Having clean driving record of the parents, or kids commuting to far away schools without cars help in such situation.
The solution is x=16. hope it helps
Answer:
268
Step-by-step explanation:
You would take 5356 and divide it by 20
Answer:
2.23kg
Step-by-step explanation:
If you can get 1 kg for $4.50. You can perform a ratio to find out how much you get for $10.
1/4.50=x/10
.2222222=x/10
multiply the 10 on both sides
x=2.23 kg for $10
The answer is B) ii
The notation "p --> q" means "if p, then q". For example
p = it rains
q = the grass gets wet
So instead of writing out "if it rains, then the grass gets wet" we can write "p --> q" or "if p, then q". The former notation is preferred in a math class like this.
So when is the overall statement p --> q false? Well only if p is true leads to q being false. Why is that? It's because p must lead to q being true. The statement strongly implies this. If it rained and the grass didn't get wet, then the original "if...then" statement would be a lie, which is how I think of a logical false statement.
If it didn't rain (p = false), then the original "if...then" statement is irrelevant. It only applies if p were true. If p is false, then the conditional statement is known to be vacuously true. So this why cases iii and iv are true.