Answer:
answer is Cannot be determined
Explanation:
given data
household income = $50,000
increases = 10% per year
time = 2 year
solution
as we know that here mean is increase by 10 percentage
but from the mean percentage increase in does not meaning that it will increase median also with same percentage
because median also increase by some percentage if data is move up
but we can not say it will move with same percentage
so here answer is Cannot be determined from given data
Answer:
A) Higher income taxes will cause a decrease in disposable income and this will affect personal expenditure which will cause the aggregate demand curve to shift leftwards ( decrease in price level and real GDP )
B)
i) Change in input price
ii) Change in production cost
iii) Increase in labor supply or increase in capital stocks
Explanation:
A) Effects of higher income taxes on aggregate demand curve
i) Higher income taxes will cause a decrease in disposable income and this will affect personal expenditure which will cause the aggregate demand curve to shift leftwards ( decrease in price level and real GDP )
B) The factors that will cause the short-run aggregate supply curve to shift
a) Change in input price
b) Change in production cost
c) Increase in labor supply or increase in capital stocks
I believe it meant both alien immigrants and non-alien immigrants? Is this the correct context, immigration? Or, does it mean extra-terrestrial life? I would need to see context to know for sure, but I believe it is referencing immigration.
<span>Distinguish how companies whose profits reflect growth in your industry are able to structure their business to cope with changes in customer needs. ... Assess your strategic objectives and your business activities to ensure that they align with achievement of your key success factors.</span>
Answer:
Weak because of proximate cause is difficult to prove in absence of other similarly affected individuals
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the 60 year old man have a lung cancer so he sues the asbestos manufacturer also he trust that it is unsafe as her friend who use the alternative material has not have a lung cancer so here the case would be weak as of proximate cause as it is difficult for proving it
Therefore the same is to be considered
