A persuasive speech on a question of fact is essentially the same as an informative speech. False. A persuasive speech and an informative speech are still two completely different types of speeches. A persuasive speech is when you are trying to change the viewpoint of someone else to reflect one similar to yours or facts. An informative speech is solely presenting the information to someone else.
Answer:
B. Does not include an opinion, but sets forth scientific facts relevant to the case that allows the trier to fact to draw their own conclusions
Explanation:
Dissertation may be described as writibg which entails the scientific detains of a research which has been performed and centered on a particular topic or subject matter. Usually, a dissertation may also be used in other to make a case cibcaeribg a certain subject such that a scientific research is conducted, this research funding will entail details and facts concerning the subject leaving out individual opinions. Hence, this dissertation will allow the relevant deduction be made by the appropriate personnel on the subject.
This example might illustrate the concept of interaction. This may mean that after the first meeting, they may again and learn more about each other, so the early impressions they formed will influence their feelings about each other in the future. His feelings towards her are influenced by how he knows her now.
Answer: B) Objectivity
Explanation:
Objectivity is the trait that determines that something does not prejudices, biasing factor, discrimination, personal view, judgmental behavior etc. Decision or thinking that is objective has certain impartiality and just behavior.
According to the question, Jonathan has objectivity in making decision because he does not let people focus on emotions rather guide them to focus on their issue so that fairness can be maintained.
Other options are incorrect because communication, awareness, sincerity and credential are not the factors that is depicted from the scenario of question.Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.
